Tenancy Deposits (Clause 31)
A new clause was inserted which would amend the tenancy deposit provisions in the Housing Act 2004. Oliver Heald explained that the 2004 Act was not intended to affect deposits paid to landlords prior to 2007 (when the relevant part of the 2004 Act came into force) and that “it was never the intention that landlords who had protected deposits and who had given their tenants information about that protection should then have to reissue the same information about the deposit protection each and every time the tenancy was renewed, although the same deposit would continue to be protected in the same scheme from one tenancy to the next”.20 However, in the case of Superstrike v Rodrigues  EWCA Civ 669, the Court of Appeal had held that “the deposit must be treated as having been paid by the tenant afresh at the start of the statutory periodic tenancy”.
Mr Heald said this case put a large number of landlords “at risk of court action and open to a financial penalty, despite having done what the sector and successive Governments considered to be the right thing”.
Clause 31 would therefore ensure that if a landlord had complied with the tenancy deposit protections requirements for a tenancy, s/he would not need to comply with them again for a replacement tenancy with the same tenant.
Where the requirements were not complied with for the original tenancy (for example if it began prior to 2007) and a replacement statutory tenancy was in place, clause 31 would give the landlord extra time to comply with the requirements.
The link is
By Margaret Collier